UNDERSTAND AND ANNIHILATE THE LONGHOUSE
Longhouse is not feminism. Longhouse means something very specific and refined.
Some people have been using the term ‘longhouse’ as a synonym for feminism, which is wrong. Longhouse is not synonymous to feminism. I intended the term ‘longhouse’ to mean something very specific i.e., when the feminine imperative acts in the cover of masculinity. There are of course overlaps between feminism and longhouse, but they're not the same. For example, moms and aunties. They would hate other girls. They're not feminists per se. But, they'll force their sons to do their bidding, stay away from other girls because they told them to, and will interfere in future between her son and his wife. That's the longhouse. Young women are as much victims of the longhouse as are young men. Generally speaking, longhouse can be understood as the dynamic using which old, ugly women rule over young men and women and ruin the experience of romance and seduction between handsome men and beautiful women. It's a spiritually (even biologically) dysgenic arrangement that doesn't allow the will to power and thirst for excellence and beauty, present in young hearts, to fully flourish. It dampens the true rage of the flame of life.
The word comes from those pre-Aryan or non-Aryan communities where large families used to live in long huts that didn't have separate rooms or anything, hence no privacy. True masculine excellence and feminine beauty couldn't flourish in those primitive societies. People spent their lives trying to cater to the needs of and protect the old, fat and ugly women of the families. The rise of high-culture — of sophisticated ways and methods of worship, emergence of specialist castes and tribes (of warriors, of artists, of priests, of merchants), the rise of spiritual and magical powers etc — was not possible. Don't think it's necessary to mention here, but a Jijabai rekindling the flame of Sri Rama inside a Shivaji to rain down hell upon the enemies of Dharma and create the ultimate exemplar of the archetypal Warrior, is not longhousing. Longhouse is a critique of primitive peoples, not traditional peoples in the true spiritual meaning of the word ‘Tradition.’ As I have said many times, larger Hindu society isn't traditional in the true sense of the word Tradition. They're superstitious atheists living life in a longhouse.
If you notice, all ideas of the Left aren't “progressives,” as they're often called. Their ideas, in fact, want to destroy all cultures and sophisticated tools of advance civilisation (materially and spiritually) and take humanity back to the life of the pre-Aryan longhouses. This is what Spengler refered with the Hindu Kala Chakra, that the modern man (the man of the leftist spirit) is taking humanity back to an extremely primitive time. They want to undo all the great work of the advanced peoples. Most places where there's no advanced civilisation — sections of Africa, Latin America and such — are all longhouses.
Mankind is largely degenerate, corrupt chimps. There were a few short periods when some peoples — Greeks, Romans, Egyptians, Hindus and a few isolated tribes here and there — turned this domesticated corrupt human ape into something else; into something more. Into beings capable of talking to the Gods. Into beings capable of becoming God. As the world kept getting more and more spiritually corrupt, their Gods withdrew from this world and the peoples died. Only the Hindu remains. India carries the last great hope and responsibility of all the great peoples and their Gods who tried to make the corrupt mankind something more. We need to fight and survive, not just for our own sake, but also for all of humanity for we are the last remaining hope for mankind to become something more; for we are the last remaining hope for this world to get divinised. This is a spiritual fight. This isn't about conserving the longhouse. If anything, the true cause of Dharma truly begins when you annihilate the longhouse.